AI-generated images are not art and why.
Art is a deeply human expression of creativity, intention, and emotion. It is a reflection of our experiences, perspectives, and the struggles we face in the world. While so-called AI-generated images may be visually stunning and technologically impressive, it falls short of being considered real art.
The essence of art lies in the intentionality of the artist, the authenticity of the work, and its ability to evoke human experiences and emotions. AI, as it exists today, lacks consciousness, emotions, and a personal worldview. Its “creativity” is a result of programmed algorithms and training data, devoid of the depth and intentionality that human artists infuse into their creations.
The process of AI image creation involves algorithms, which mimic a creative tug-of-war between a generator and a discriminator. While this process can produce visually appealing outputs, it lacks the genuine thought, interpretation, and emotional engagement that human artists bring to their work.
Authenticity is another crucial aspect of art. AI-generated image merely replicates patterns and styles it has learned from training data, without truly comprehending their meaning. It cannot capture the personal experiences and emotions that human artists embed in their artwork.
Determining authorship in AI-generated images is also complex. While the programmer plays a role in creating the AI system, they do not have direct control over the specific output. The AI itself cannot be considered the artist, as it lacks consciousness and intention. Even the original creators of the training data do not intend for their work to be used in this manner.
The rise of AI-generated images also raises concerns about the impact on human artists. The sheer volume and rapid production of AI images can overshadow human-created art, making it harder for artists to gain recognition and compete economically. The novelty and technological appeal of AI images may attract attention, but it can undermine the deeper emotional and aesthetic value of human-created art.
As we navigate the intersection of AI and art, it is crucial to maintain a balance and ensure the recognition and preservation of human creativity. While AI-generated images has its place as a tool for inspiration and in specific contexts, it should not dilute or overshadow the essence of human-created art. The ethical implications of AI images, such as authorship and intellectual property, must be addressed through guidelines and regulations.
In conclusion, AI-generated content may have its merits, but it lacks the core elements that define art as a deeply human expression. The distinction between AI-generated images and human-created art must be upheld to preserve the authenticity, intentionality, and emotional depth that make art a powerful and meaningful form of expression.
AI should only be used to inspire, to help with concept, learning or at most to create pieces of a collage. AI-generated images are NOT art; it’s just a prompt to scour the internet, to compile associated images inspired by and stolen from true artists. There is no unique creativity or expression if you take it out of the human artist’s hands.
